October 2009

There were 43 posts published in October 2009 (this is page 3 of 5).

N&O overreaches in its anti-Easley campaign

I know the News and Observer has had some kind of obsession with former Governor Mike Easley but today’s front-page story is really a stretch.

Easley was a member of the Old Chatham Golf Club in Chatham County, apparently getting his membership fees waived. While that’s nice to know and may have been worthy of a story, the latest story about the club getting water for irrigation during the drought of 2002 is a non-story as far as I’m concerned. The crux of the issue is right here:

Frantz, who did not return numerous phone messages, routed the request to the Chatham County commissioners, who unanimously agreed June 3 to let the club pump as much as 450,000 gallons a day for irrigation for up to three months. The water would be counted against the county’s daily allocation from Jordan Lake. State law considers pumping more than 100,000 gallons a day to be a major withdrawal.

The county was not drawing all the 4 million gallons per day it was allowed; there was no debate among commissioners about the request, according to minutes of the commisers’ [sic] meeting County Manager Charlie Horne.

See that? Chatham County wasn’t using its 4 million gallon allocation and the the Chatham County Commissioners unanimously agreed to let the club pump the water. It was Chatham County’s water and the state didn’t have a problem with Chatham spending it as it saw fit. The state’s “getting involved,” as the N&O alleges, amounted to the state shrugging its shoulders, and rightfully so.

The Governor can order state agencies to reduce water use but he or she does not have the power to order private businesses or individuals to conserve. It’s ludicrous for the N&O to suggest otherwise.

I’ll be happy when the N&O catches up to 2009 and starts covering the issues we face today. Then again, my faith in the so-called “Old Reliable” has pretty much run out.

No Sissies

What a great song. If I had a band I would cover this in a heartbeat.

No Sissies (YouTube)
Hawksley Workman

You’re being so tough to me
Like a leather jacket
I know you’ll have no sissies
No baby, you just wouldn’t hack it
Gotta be a strong man
To carry the beautiful burden of your love

No sissies get your love
No slackers get your love
No weaklings get your love
No suckers for your love
No actors for your love
No gangsters for your love
No sissies get your love
Continue reading →

IBM’s computer archives

IBM-5520

As a kid I remember my dad taking us to his office at IBM on an occasional weekend. While he’d fetch something from his office we’d all look around at the technology around us. The darkened offices were full of mysterious, silent computer displays and massive copiers. In those days before the IBM PC these strange, exciting boxes always fascinated me.

I recently stumbled again upon IBM’s Computer Exhibits Archives, where IBM’s earlier computers still live on, if only as webpages. It was fun checking out the hardware I remember as a kid.

Another mystery bot example

Here’s another example of bizarre hits. Two hits for this six-year-old page coming in within 30 minutes of each other:

138.162.8.57 – – [15/Oct/2009:12:12:16 -0400] “GET /2003/07/28/blimps-and-other-things-bizarre/ HTTP/1.1” 200 5094 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”

[snip]

138.163.106.72 – – [15/Oct/2009:12:44:33 -0400] “GET /2003/07/28/blimps-and-other-things-bizarre/ HTTP/1.1” 200 5094 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”

The first resolves to gate2-jacksonville.nmci.navy.mil and the second resolves to gate2-bremerton.nmci.navy.mil. It looks like there’s a full-scale botnet attack going on behind the DoD firewalls right now.

More clues in the government botnet mystery

The plot thickens in the government botnet mystery I recently wrote about. This morning I got hits from the Navy-Marine Corps-Internet, specifically a host identified as gate3-norfolk.nmci.navy.mil:

Again, it started off innocently with a Google search, with the browser properly identified:

138.162.0.41 – – [15/Oct/2009:08:36:27 -0400] “GET /2008/12/19/beware-the-police-protective-fund/ HTTP/1.1” 200 6377 “http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=police+protective+fund&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g10” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022)”

A few more hits down, I see the random jumping around I’d seen before:

138.162.0.41 – – [15/Oct/2009:08:36:30 -0400] “GET /2008/12/20/a-mange-in-a-wager/ HTTP/1.1” 200 4191 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”
138.162.0.42 – – [15/Oct/2009:08:36:30 -0400] “GET /2003/07/29/goodbye-bplog-hello-drupal/ HTTP/1.1” 200 14042 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”
138.162.0.44 – – [15/Oct/2009:08:36:30 -0400] “GET /2003/07/27/action-packed_weekend/ HTTP/1.1” 200 4371 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”
138.162.0.43 – – [15/Oct/2009:08:36:30 -0400] “GET /2003/07/24/keys_keys_keys/ HTTP/1.1” 200 5531 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”
138.162.0.45 – – [15/Oct/2009:08:36:31 -0400] “GET /2008/12/18/progress/feed/ HTTP/1.1” 200 1973 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”

My site is apparently being indexed by computers on a government-run network, but the question is exactly what is indexing it? Is this some sort of proxy technology that government gateways are now using, sampling websites that government users are viewing to ensure that these websites don’t have questionable content? Or, is this a botnet of compromised government computers as I recently suggested? Or (tinfoil hats, please), is this a secret spidering project run by a three-letter agency that uses the gateways of various government departments as cover?

The bottom line is these hits are inconsistent with a human browser. Beyond that I’m not sure what to make of them.

U.S. Government networks thoroughly penetrated

I saw this in my webserver logs today, from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency. Clearly it’s a botnet bot.

148.184.174.62 – – [13/Oct/2009:12:25:44 -0400] “GET /wp-content/themes/mtdotnet
/images/kubrickfooter.jpg HTTP/1.1” 200 2443 “http://www.markturner.net/2009/10/01/michael-jordans-net-worth/” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)”
148.184.174.62 – – [13/Oct/2009:12:25:44 -0400] “GET /2009/10/02/oculan-in-the-news/feed/ HTTP/1.1” 200 797 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”
148.184.174.62 – – [13/Oct/2009:12:25:44 -0400] “GET /2009/10/02/u2-yesterday-and-today/ HTTP/1.1” 200 6617 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”
148.184.174.62 – – [13/Oct/2009:12:25:44 -0400] “GET /2009/09/30/juggling-breakthrough/feed/ HTTP/1.1” 200 2083 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”
148.184.174.62 – – [13/Oct/2009:12:25:44 -0400] “GET /2009/09/30/netflixs-plan-to-take-over-the-world/ HTTP/1.1” 200 6419 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”
148.184.174.62 – – [13/Oct/2009:12:25:45 -0400] “GET /2009/10/02/u2-yesterday-and-today/feed/ HTTP/1.1” 200 1375 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”
148.184.174.62 – – [13/Oct/2009:12:25:45 -0400] “GET /2003/07/27/action-packed-weekend/feed/ HTTP/1.1” 200 1260 “-” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;)”

Continue reading →

N&O still not web-savvy

So the News and Observer recently revamped their website yet again and I think I preferred the previous version. Seemed much cleaner to me, and also seemed to load faster.

One thing bit the N&O the last time they upgraded and they didn’t seem to learn the lesson because they made the same mistake again. They didn’t maintain links to their stories, a big webmaster no no! Any favorable ranking Google gave their stories just got shot all to hell because the web team failed to provide forwarding links from their old stories to the versions on their new site. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

And the newspaper industry wonders why it can’t seem to succeed on the Internet.

Back on the map, sort of

On a whim I checked my address again in Google Maps. After first having it in Google Maps, then finding it missing, I wasn’t sure whether when my neighborhood would “exist” again as far as Google was concerned. Looks like my submitting it to Google’s map company affiliate finally did the trick. It’s been exactly one year since I alerted them.

But all is not happy in Mapland, oh noooo. Seems that even though typing the address in will correctly highlight my house, the map itself shows my street as Bennett Street. It seems that Tonsler Drive exists enough in Googleland to pinpoint my house but the street name still doesn’t show up on the map view. And Street View is still broken, though it once worked.

I give up!

Simple pleasures

Kelly’s volunteering at Hallie’s school this morning, so I’m working from home and had to take charge of the kids. Both of them needed to be delivered to Conn so we walked down Edmund Street together. Before we were past our friend Randy’s house we saw our friends the Bettis following us, so we waited for Lorenzo, his mom Veronica, his brother Nicolo, and their dog to catch up. We picked up Oscar at his house, too, making us quite a gaggle!

I’d forgotten just how much fun it is to walk Hallie to school. Today’s walk was a bonus!