N&O switches to Facebook comments

The News and Observer switched to Facebook comments for its online stories today. I suppose that’s a good thing, since the previous comment system was frequently the target of spammers.

It will be interesting to see if the N&O follows through on its belief that if it’s worth saying, one should sign one’s name to it. Can we expect the newspaper to start putting names on its editorials?

We’ve always wanted our story forums to be places for robust, but civil, exchanges of opinion on the issues of the day. But too often, they become pits of mudslinging and abuse that scare off folks who want a rational conversation.

The biggest reason: Our systems have allowed readers to use screen names that hide their identities.

We believe that if you have something to say, you should be willing to put your name on it.

via Why we’ve changed how you comment on our site | Local/State | NewsObserver.com.

The Idea Factory

theideafactory
I’m reading a fascinating book about the legendary Bell Labs, called “The Idea Factory” by Jon Gertner. I knew Bell Labs was responsible for many of the innovations we take for granted now, but seeing them all in print was amazing.

It is simply astonishing to consider how this research lab changed our world. For instance, Bell Labs invented the transistor, semiconductors, and photolithography, all of which are absolutely crucial for modern electronics. Scientists at Bell built the world’s first communications satellite after serendipitously inventing the major technologies needed for it. Perhaps the most important technology that came from Bell Labs was information theory, which sprang from a brilliant Bell Labs scientist named Claude Shannon. Wikipedia explains its impact:

Information theory is a branch of applied mathematics, electrical engineering, bioinformatics, and computer science involving the quantification of information. Information theory was developed by Claude E. Shannon to find fundamental limits on signal processing operations such as compressing data and on reliably storing and communicating data. Since its inception it has broadened to find applications in many other areas, including statistical inference, natural language processing, cryptography, neurobiology,[1] the evolution[2] and function[3] of molecular codes, model selection[4] in ecology, thermal physics,[5] quantum computing, plagiarism detection[6] and other forms of data analysis.[7]

Applications of fundamental topics of information theory include lossless data compression (e.g. ZIP files), lossy data compression (e.g. MP3s and JPGs), and channel coding (e.g. for Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)). The field is at the intersection of mathematics, statistics, computer science, physics, neurobiology, and electrical engineering. Its impact has been crucial to the success of the Voyager missions to deep space, the invention of the compact disc, the feasibility of mobile phones, the development of the Internet, the study of linguistics and of human perception, the understanding of black holes, and numerous other fields. Important sub-fields of information theory are source coding, channel coding, algorithmic complexity theory, algorithmic information theory, information-theoretic security, and measures of information.

Shannon did work on cryptography during World War II; his paper A Mathematical Theory of Cryptography was so groundbreaking that it remains classified to this day.

Without Bell Labs, we’d have no home computers, no smartphones (actually no cellphones of any kind), no solar panels, no communications satellites, no lasers, no UNIX, no Internet, no C or C++ computer languages, and no Silicon Valley, for starters. Scientists and researchers at Bell Labs literally invented the future.

The Idea Factory is a fascinating look at how so many world-changing technologies could’ve come from one place. Those who walked the halls of Bell Labs were truly giants.

Here are a few other reviews of the book, from BusinessWeek and the New York Times.

Avila and the broadband divide

It’s refreshing to see Rep. Marilyn Avila express some concern about the lack of broadband.

Avila was praised by N&O executive editor John Drescher in her defense of requiring local governments buy newspaper space for their legal notices:

“Are our citizens going to have to bookmark every website for every department in every division and check it every day to figure out what we’re up to down here?” she asked, adding that many residents don’t have Internet access.

Continue reading

Parcel arrived in the office of Postal service

Looks like more virus-laden emails are being sent, this time using “Postal Express” rather than the United Parcel Service notices of last time.

Again, do not open any attachments from people you don’t know (or services you don’t use).

Return-Path: post.express@wichita.com
X-Original-To: Mark Turner
Delivered-To: Mark Turner
Received: from wichita.com (200.146.124.135.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br [200.146.124.135])
by myserver (Postfix) with SMTP id 51AD9141BE
for me; Tue, 24 May 2011 00:27:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: 001a01cc19ca$e32ca4c6$0301010a@home-pc
From: “Post Express Service” post.express@wichita.com
To: Mark Turner
Subject: Parcel arrived in the office of Postal service
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 01:27:27 -0200

Dear Customer

Your package has been returned to the Post Express office.
The reason of the return is “Incorrect delivery address of the package”
Information about your package is attached to the letter.

Thank you.
Post Express Service.

Attachment: Postal_Document_95816.zip

Raising the broadband bar in NC

There’s been plenty afoot in the N.C. General Assembly this session regarding broadband internet, as those couple of you who read my blog are well aware. Now there’s an effort by the telecom industry to define “broadband service” in North Carolina. House Bill 283 would define any Internet service with speeds faster than 1.5 Mbps down and 384 kbps up.

So let me ask you … how many of you would consider that “broadband?” How many of you would die a slow death using the Internet at those speeds? A measly 1.5 Mbps/384kbs might have been considered “broadband” 15 years ago but it certainly doesn’t pass for that today, now that countries like Japan have jaw-dropping 160 Mbps cable modem service. Arguably these slow speeds weren’t considered “broadband” 15 years ago, either!
Continue reading

Non-stop day

It was quite a busy day for me. I began the day by skipping breakfast and heading out at 7 AM to get my cholesterol checked. I had to drive to the Cary lab near my doctor and had an unwelcome reunion with the concept of rush-hour traffic. It didn’t take much staring at brake lights to make me so happy I don’t face that every day.

I got done with my appointment in time to park downtown and race to my office in time for a 9 AM conference call. This was followed by an 11 AM conference call, followed by a noon conference call.
Continue reading

Disconnected, but in a good way

I’m about to cancel the $10 DSL I’ve had after having tested it and deciding we don’t need it anymore. The plan now is to drop Bellsouth service entirely and go to VoIP over our cable service. I’m still mulling that change over, though.

As I perused Bellsouth’s FastaccessDSL page, I note that the FastAccess DSL Direct service – the DSL service without phone service I mentioned earlier – is now listed on the DSL page. Its near the bottom of the page, mind you, but at least it’s there.

And to think you heard it here first on MT.Net!

Dual-homed home

For those of you who were waiting with baited breath to know how my AT&T FastAccess DSL was working for me (you remember, the $10/month plan?), I have been slack in updating you.

In short, it works great. Not fast enough to replace my cable modem, however, not with 768Kbps down and 128Kbps up. It wasn’t more than an hour or two before Kelly was complaining about the slow connection.
Continue reading

Orcas Island Life

I’m in the parking lot of the Orcas Island Library, which offers free WiFi access. It turns out the neighbor’s WiFi that I’d been, um, security auditing the past few days disappeared yesterday afternoon, so we’ve been offline for a while. The library’s network doesn’t seem to like picture uploads, either, so you won’t see much until I can solve that particular problem. Shame, too, as its absolutely gorgeous here.
Continue reading

New Cable TV Rules On The Horizon

WRAL alerted me today to upcoming changes in the state’s cable television laws. A bill entitled An Act to Promote Consumer Choice In Video Service Providers And To Establish Uniform Taxes For Video Programming, or short title “Video Service Competition Act” (House Bill 2047) would take away local franchising authority in favor of state oversight. Supporters claim this will enhance competition because Big Telcos like Bellsouth wouldn’t have to negotiate for each franchise.

I have mixed thoughts about this. In essence, what’s wrong with local franchising authorities? When your cable service is out and the lazy repairmen won’t fix it or charges appear on your cable bill that you didn’t authorize, the local franchising authority can be a powerful ally in getting the problem fixed. Does anyone really think the State of North Carolina is going to take these issues more seriously than the local government?

Generally, I’m in favor of pushing authority on issues out as locally as possible. Raleigh knows what’s best for Raleigh. Ditto Durham, Charlotte, and other places. You’ve got to have a really good reason before you consider taking that authority away. What reason, other than Bellsouth lobbied for it, is there to upset the apple cart? Why does Bellsouth not want to play by the rules that everyone else plays by?

The real reason this bill is being pushed by Bellsouth is that Big Telcos want satellite services like Dish Network and DirecTV taxed similarly to terrestrial services like DSL and cable television, even though satellite services don’t use any public right of way! That’s right: Hughes Electronics invested many millions in building and launching their satellites and uplink facilities. Millions of their own, private money. They don’t use public resources like rights-of-way. Why should DirecTV be taxed like a franchise if it’s not making money with public dirt like the cable and phone lines?

To me, this bill sounds like a giant win for the Big Telcos and a big blow for advocates of cable TV accoutability. I welcome comments from state legislators who wish to prove me wrong.