North Carolina telephone solicitation law

Article 4.
Telephone Solicitations.

ยง 75-100. Findings.

The General Assembly finds all of the following:

(1) The use of the telephone to market goods and services to the home is now pervasive due to the increased use of cost?effective telephone solicitation technologies and techniques.

(2) While some consumers enjoy and benefit from telephone solicitations from legitimate telephone solicitors, many others object to these telephone solicitations as an intrusive invasion of their privacy in the home.

(3) In addition, the proliferation of telephone solicitations, especially during the evening hours, creates a nuisance and a disturbance upon the home and family life of telephone subscribers during a time of day used by many families for traditional family activities.

(4) North Carolina residents should have the freedom to choose whether or not to permit telephone solicitors to contact them.
Continue reading

Another car warranty scam phone call

Just when the phones at MT.Net were no longer ringing with car warranty scams, we got another one this morning. This time it’s from phone number 732-903-0837. Some folks on the 800notes website say it’s a New Jersey company called Motor Vehicle Protection Corporation. That’s who the salesguy said was calling. Could this company be the spawn of Great Atlantic Warranty/North American Warranty Solutions or Automotive Warranty Solutions?

As I’ve long been on the Do Not Call list, it’s time to collect some money from these bastards. Time to see how this works.

Update 11:30 AM: Bah. Looking at the wording on the N.C. Attorney General’s page, the bastards get one free call before I can sic the dogs on them:

If you have received more than one telephone call by or on behalf of the same entity that is in violation of the Do Not Call law, you may go to state court …

How much you wanna bet that the company will then claim a “prior business relationship” based on the first bogus call? This law is toothless!

To recap, the Motor Vehicle Protection Corporation is violating the Do Not Call registry, but they’re doing it below the penalty phase of the law. The company is identifying itself with a live human being, which is a step up from the previous car warranty scams. In essence, the scam continues but with fewer vulnerabilities for state attorneys general to attack. Clever, indeed.

Also for those of you finding this on Google, we received a dead-air call from this number over the last few days. This is likely from the company’s auto-dialer, finding live phone numbers to later feed to its sales queue. Oh, hey! This is where my “more than one” phone call comes into play! I can sue them after all!

Cronkiters

230px-Cronkitenasa

On the heels of the bogus Einstein Bees quote and the bogus Thomas Jefferson Deflation quote comes news that the claim that newscasters in Sweden are named “cronkiters” after legendary newsman Walter Cronkite is also bogus.

David Halberstam gets the dubious honor of first reporting this untruth, having mentioned it in an Atlantic Weekly piece in 1976:

In the spring of 1962 Cronkite became the CBS anchorman. He was rooted in a certain tradition and he was the best of that tradition. He set standards by which others were judged. In Sweden, anchormen came to be known as Cronkiters….

Cronkite himself repeated the claim in his 1996 autobiography A Reporter’s Life:

I remember hearing Paul [Levitan, CBS producer] first explain the term [“anchorman”] as referring to the person on a relay team who runs the key last lap, and then Sig said it referred to the steady anchor that holds a boat in place. In any case, the meaning had been changed forever, and I was the first bearer of it. Sweden was a little slow to adopt the term. There, for some years, anchormen were called “cronkiters.”

Amazingly, no one bothered to fact-check it until after Cronkite’s death. It illustrates the level of Cronkite’s credibility that he could (innocently) repeat this falsehood and people would take him at his word.

If Walter said it, then that’s the way it was!

Pinwale: The NSA’s email collection system

The New York Times has details about the NSA’s new email collection system named Pinwale which has been used to collect not only foreign email conversations but domestic ones, too.

As a former cryptographer, this seriously disturbs me. As I said before, it used to be that the folks at the NSA took their responsibility to protect Americans and their privacy seriously. It’s a shame that that’s apparently changed.

Mary Easley and N.C. State

I tell you, I should’ve gone into academia. Where else can you be asked to resign, then take a six month paid vacation on a salary well into six figures? Yes, life is good inside the ivory towers. Well, execpt for the students who are being milked for a hefty tuition raise this year.

Then there’s the case of N.C. State Chancellor James Oblinger, who resigned today as emails surfaced contradicting his earlier statements of non-involvement in the hiring of Mary Easley. Oblinger was either lying or he admitted that as chancellor of one of the nation’s leading technical universities he didn’t know how to search his own emails. I’m not sure which is worse.
Continue reading

Tagged.com – a social media scam

I got a few emails today from the guy who rented us our beach condo last year. The subject was “Jim sent you photos on Tagged :)” and the body said:

Jim Nothisrealname
Jim Nothisrealname sent you photos on Tagged
Want to see the photos?

Click Yes if you want to see the photos, otherwise click No.
But you have to click!

Please respond or John may think you said no ๐Ÿ™

Here’s what it looked like:
tagged-email-small
Continue reading

Rankcrawler update

I received an email this evening from Philippe Martin at RankCrawler, apologizing for the bad bot behavior:

Dear Mark Turner,

I apologize for not properly identifying our crawler (RankCrawler) by using the user agent. Our reverse-dns go to rankcrawler.com but we don’t use our own user agent. We will fix this problem soon. We have stopped to crawl your website as soon as I read your message.

We DO NOT crawl with the IP 94.23.51.159 as you claim in your second blog post about Rancrawler. It should be another company that we don’t know and that uses the same ISP (OVH is a very large ISP). We uses at this time only 5 IP that goes to rankcrawler.com.

I apologize again for this problem and I hope you will let our crawler access your website once we properly identify our crawler with our own user agent.

Thank you for your message,

Philippe Martin
http://rancrawler.com

I’m pleased that Mr. Martin chose to respond to my complaint and as such, I will allow RankCrawler to access MT.Net once again.

Rankcrawler bot update

Sheesh. Just after I finished blocking Rankcrawler from accessing my site, I found yet another connection attempt from them – this time from a totally new IP address:

94.23.51.159 – – [31/May/2009:07:14:02 -0400] “GET /2009/05/30/conn-clusion/ HTTP/1.1” 200 5574 “http://real-url.org” “Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;MSIE 5.01; Windows -NT 5.0 – real-url.org)”
94.23.51.159 – – [31/May/2009:07:15:25 -0400] “GET /2009/05/30/conn-clusion/ HTTP/1.0” 200 5574 “-” “-”
94.23.51.159 – – [31/May/2009:07:15:25 -0400] “POST /xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.0” 200 473 “-” “XML-RPC for PHP 2.2.2”

This IP resolves to rps6637.ovh.net. OVH.Net is the same ISP that Rankcrawler uses. They just can’t take no for an answer.

[Update: 1 June 2009] Rankcrawler says this isn’t them. Duly noted.