Flares over Raleigh

Saturday night at 9:45 PM, Kelly and I were up on the grassy lawn at Red Hat Amphitheater watching Steve Martin and the Steep Canyon Rangers play. Kelly pointed over to the northwest sky, above Dawson Street. Floating through the sky were a half-dozen flickering little balls of amber light. I blinked a few times before deciding they were flares. As the concert went on, the flares continued to march slowly south across the sky. There were well over a dozen of them. I’m sure the 911 center got more than one report of UFOs.

After the concert ended, Raleigh started up its fireworks show from the parking deck behind us. I wondered if the flares had been launched to gauge the air currents, as the flares seemed to have been launched from the direction of Fire Station #1 at Martin and Dawson Streets. I’m not sure why they would need to launch over a dozen of them to do this, though. Why wouldn’t one or two be sufficient? And why launch them well over an hour before the fireworks began?

I think I’ll reach out to my (few) contacts at the fire department to see how the whole process of setting up for fireworks, well … works.

Update 2 Oct 5:53 PM: Raleigh Fire Department says the flares aren’t theirs.

PopSci decides Internet comments are “bad for science.” That’s lazy and wrong.

Slate’s Will Oremus has a nice counterpoint to Popular Science’s recent decision to disallow comments on its web stories.

Now, I get as annoyed as the next right-thinking person when Internet commenters misconstrue scientific research—let alone when they regale me with tales of their aunt’s third cousin who makes $73 an hour working from home. But I couldn’t help but notice an almost religious zeal in LaBarre’s framing of her magazine’s mission. Spreading the word of science? Undermining bedrock scientific doctrine? Substitute “Christianity” for “science” and “Christian” for “scientific” in those two phrases and perhaps you’ll see what makes me uncomfortable here. These aren’t the words of a scientist. They’re the words of an evangelist.

via Future Tense.

Was Goldsboro’s Broken Arrow more broken than announced?

As I mentioned before, I have become captivated by the 1961 Goldsboro B-52 crash which resulted in two thermonuclear weapons being dropped in Faro, NC field. This Broken Arrow incident was in the news when a declassified document was released claiming one switch stopped an enormous nuclear detonation (is there any other kind?) from obliterating eastern North Carolina.

My concern when first learning about this incident was that just a flimsy switch protected the first bomb. After reading multiple interviews with Jack ReVelle, it seems the first bomb wasn’t the worry at all. The second bomb has been the one shrouded in mystery and ReVelle’s interviews seem to indicate that this bomb was always the concern.
Continue reading

Bringing the jobs of yesterday to Raleigh

Mary_Ann-Jobs_of_Tomorrow-small

This made me laugh. I got this campaign postcard in the mail from my city councilor friend, Mary-Ann. It says she’s “bringing the jobs of tomorrow to Raleigh today.”

Well, not quite. While Mary-Ann has certainly worked hard to promote innovation and entrepreneurship in Raleigh, these jobs won’t be “computer programmer” jobs because that job title fell out of favor about two decades ago. Nowadays the wizards who do this work are called “software developers” or, even more commonly, “software engineers.” And good luck trying to find even these titles in a newspaper’s help wanted section, because no one puts job listings in newspapers anymore. Geeks go to LinkedIn, Monster.com, CareerBuilder, Indeed, or Craigslist to find jobs now.

Aside from these quibbles, though, I do applaud Mary-Ann for her work in helping increase the geek population in Raleigh. Geeks make everything better!

N&O endorsements

Today’s N&O listed its endorsements for city council. While I agree with most of them, I have to wonder how the N&O could fail to endorse incumbent councilor Randy Stagner.

Randy has worked very hard as a councilor. He may be the one most likely to show up at a meeting, whether it be a community meeting or otherwise. As the Parks board liaison for the past two years, Randy has showed up more frequently to Parks board meetings than any other city council liaison I can recall since I began serving. He takes his work very seriously.

One of his passions is transportation issues, passion for which we are in desperate need of here. He is a cyclist who frequents our greenways. He also spearheaded the creation of the Greenway Volunteers program, putting over 70 citizen volunteers to work monitoring our greenways. This program was his initiative, and it has helped Raleigh avoid the kind of crime that sometimes occurs on Durham’s American Tobacco Trail.

Randy also took up the issue of Sandy Forks Road, a District A street that’s long been in truly abysmal shape. Through his efforts, bond money is being secured to give this road the attention it has long needed.

Randy’s not beholden to special interests. He’s a retired Army colonel who has a lifetime of public service experience. Has he made a few rookie mistakes? Certainly, but overall he’s done a fine job and deserves another term.

On the other hand, Randy’s opponent is an attorney for real estate developers. He has a poor grasp of the issues, whether it be the city’s Unified Development Ordinance, how the parks system works, and other issues. His service on the council while working his day job would almost certainly be a conflict of interest. In short, he would be a train wreck. How the paper’s editorial board could give him the nod is beyond me. I worry that Colin Campbells’ less-than-stellar reporting has tainted their judgment.

Election? What election?

On my way to work this morning, I was startled to see election signs along Wade Avenue, signs urging passage of the transportation bond. There’s no reason I should’ve been startled, since Raleigh’s municipal election is less than two weeks away, not to mention our family went to a political fundraiser for the mayor last night. But I was startled, and it occurred to me that the reason I was startled is that I’ve seen precious few political signs this election cycle.

Is it voter apathy? Is it because so many incumbents are returning to city council? Is there no drama in this election? You can certainly find signs in the yards of all the true believer, hard-core followers of politics but the other 90% of people don’t seem to be flying the political flag this year. At least for the municipal elections.

I don’t think I can recall a city election that’s been this quiet in all the years I’ve lived in Raleigh. It’s odd.

Why We’re Shutting Off Our Comments | Popular Science

Popular Science is disabling comments on their stories. The research they cite shows how influential reader comments can be, undermining PopSci’s mission to promote science.

From the time I’ve spent in the reader forums of local media sites, I wholeheartedly agree that comments often do more harm than good.

Comments can be bad for science. That’s why, here at PopularScience.com, we’re shutting them off.

It wasn’t a decision we made lightly. As the news arm of a 141-year-old science and technology magazine, we are as committed to fostering lively, intellectual debate as we are to spreading the word of science far and wide. The problem is when trolls and spambots overwhelm the former, diminishing our ability to do the latter.

via Why We're Shutting Off Our Comments | Popular Science.

Air Force introduces QF-16 drones

Boeing and the Air Force just introduced a new drone to their drone program: the F-16. It was the first time an F-16 has ever flown without a pilot aboard.

This video reminded me of my visit to the Tyndall drone range in 2009, watching old F-4 Phantom IIs roar over me. It was like I was back in the Navy with my destroyer acting as plane guard behind an aircraft carrier on flight operations.

Here’s a great story on the drone program if you’d like to learn more.

The homeless and Moore Square

The past few weeks have had a number of stories, many unflattering, about Raleigh’s treatment of groups feeding the homeless in Moore Square. It seems most of the coverage has been one-sided in favor of the groups, often stretching the truth in some cases. I am not privy to the decisions that went into the city’s controversial policy – those are made at a level much higher than mine – but I do have some thoughts about the situation.

  • No one should go hungry. I think everyone agrees on this.
  • Moore Square is a public park.
  • A lot of homeless people hang around the park.
  • Everyone is welcome to use the park during the day.
  • The park is frequently full of trash.
  • There have been a number of violent incidents in the park.
  • Anyone with a history of violence should not be welcome in the park.
  • There are better places to feed the hungry.
  • A meal is only a small fraction (though important, nonetheless) of what these people need.

Continue reading