3. I find it somewhat amusing that the article you point out labels Anna Ardin as “Sarah” and Sofia Wilén as “Jessica”. The women’s names have been out for a while now and as the article notes, the charges are of dubious merit. What is there to gain by censoring their names?

    The article also fails to mention Anna Ardin’s blog post about the steps for revenge against an ex-boyfriend that she published and later tried to delete that almost exactly matches what has happened between her and Assange.

  4. Actually, the article does mention the telling blog post:

    Earlier this year, Sarah is reported to have posted a telling entry on her website, which she has since removed. But a copy has been retrieved and widely circulated on the internet.

    Entitled ‘7 Steps to Legal Revenge’, it explains how women can use courts to get their own back on unfaithful lovers.

    Step 7 says: ‘Go to it and keep your goal in sight. Make sure your victim suffers just as you did.’ (The highlighting of text is Sarah’s own.)

    I guess you need to actually do some research on this! 🙂

Comments are closed.