1. it’s easy to take statements and news clips out of context and paste them together in a nice pretty film to make it say whatever you want. But that doesn’t make it true. Just ask Michael Moore!

    I am curious. What exactly is this trying to tell me? That a missle hit the Pentagon, not a plane? Where does this missle come from? And from whom? And why would the FBI confiscate the evidence?

  2. I don’t know the answers to your first two questions. I’m not sure those questions can be answered. We can speculate on your third question, however.

    Why would the FBI confiscate the evidence? If the official story was true, any video would either show an airliner crashing into the side of the building, or it would not. There would be absolutely no reason “national security” would be compromised by the release of the tape. Nor would any investigation be hampered.

    Any why should you let anything try to tell you something? All media has bias of one kind or another. You should always think critically about everything you see and hear. If you can’t agree with anything else Michael Moore is doing, at least he shows this to be true. Inadvertently, but he does.

  3. The problem I have with Moore is he inadvertently does that on purpose.

    anyway, I get what you’re saying. I was asking those questions because someone obviously made that clip with some idea of how things went down. I’m just curious on what your take is.

    I think this whole Pentagon thing had something to do with Mecca-Streisand… the FBI is hiding video of Robert Smith.

  4. Although I don’t know German all that well, it sounded like that’s what was on in the background. If it wasn’t German, then please let me know what the point to that foreign language was.

    So, I guess this guy is implying Nazi regime to our current president. Because of this, it lacks credibility. Ya know, like that funny “How to win an argument” piece…

    Scoot-Dogg

  5. WHAT ARE YOU TAKING ABOUT??? DO YOU WANT THE HURRICANE TO HIT YOU??

    sincerely,
    Every post on the Storm2k message board and a great way to end an argument

  6. I don’t think the person who put the clip together necessarily had to have some idea how it went down. It is based on well-known facts, and even includes relevant sources.

    As for my take,

    My take is that something obviously hit the Pentagon. It just wasn’t Flight 77.

    1. No one can fly two feet off the ground in a 757 at 580 MPH.

    2. The entire lawn should be aflame since the wings (fuel tanks) would have remained outside.

    3. The engines, hanging off the bottom of the wing and roughly ten feet tall, would have also become instant lawn ornaments. Yet there are none in any pictures. Why?

    4. Dozens of witnesses reported a “small plane” or a “missile.” Do they just not know the difference? Would you remember seeing an airliner that was two feet off the ground?

    5. Why not release the videotapes? Do they show something we aren’t meant to see? You can’t claim they are classified, nor can you claim it would cause distress to the families. It stinks to high heaven.

    6. I once saw an official picture on FEMA’s website that showed a turbofan roughly four feet wide which supposedly came out of the Pentagon. Where did THAT thing fit on a 757?

    Where is Flight 77? Who knows? But one thing I’m convinced of is that it couldn’t possibly have hit the Pentagon.

Comments are closed.