in Uncategorized

More 9/11 ‘Chatter’

Some coworkers brought up my recent posts on the World Trade Center attacks. A few more interesting links include Flight 175: Too Hot To Handle and Operation 911: No Suicide Pilots.

The first link has one of the most detailed dissections of the second plane, including some evidence that the plane that hit the tower was not the United Airlines N612UA plane, a Boeing 767-200, but in fact the larger 767-300. Shown are some fuselage measurements which appear to back that claim up. If this is so, it may be more proof the planes were switched.

On the second page of that link, a very important point it brought up:
Modern planes are complicated creatures that incorporate a whole slew of sophisticated technology. First among them, flight computers that instantly override any accidental brusque manoeuvres; you don’t want your business-class customers slopping their Dom Perignon over their immaculate suits, just because the pilot sneezes at the wrong moment.

The banking manoeuvre we see here, just as flight 175 is about to slam into the South Tower, would have been overridden by the onboard flight computer. So somebody must have previously overridden the flight computers themselves.

In other words, you’ll never see a commercial aircraft make that kind of bank. The “fly by wire” flight computers would forbid it. So how did it happen?

The second link also shows how a remotely-controlled plane could have done the deed. It also has an interesting theory about the origin of the “Operation Northwoods” documents, featured in James Bamford’s book Body of Secrets. The author suggests that the Operation Northwoods documents are counterfeit, which makes sense to me now but did not then. She states that since convicted FBI spy Robert Hanssen was friends with Bamford, and that this was no coincidence in the “discovery” of the Northwoods document.

Thinking back on it, I can see how the Northwoods document is counterfeit. Outside of its outrageous subject, it does contain phrases strange to American speech. What is also strange is the talk of a small plane being replaced by a drone.

The technology of 1961 to create a drone would likely have required a vehicle much bigger than a small plane could hold. Also, unlike today, radar screens used by air traffic controllers were of the analog variety: they showed exactly what was in the air. Modern ATC radar is digitized, meaning blips can be selectively filtered out. This is done routinely for some military flights, I was told by an ATC watch supervisor on a tour of the local control tower a few years back.

So, in 1961, you couldn’t filter out planes from the radar, but now you can. You couldn’t fly drones as easily, now you can.

What if Hanssen (or someone else) tipped off Bamford to the planned WTC attacks through the planting of the Operation Northwoods document?

Follow the links. Make up your own mind.